Field of Glory: Assyrians v Babylonians, 3 March 2010

Another quieter games night at Adrian's meant a further opportunity for FoG. Deej and Adrian were keen to try out the Neo-Babylonians with a Median Ally, and Orhan's Assyrians (with Stu as 2ic) had ditched the disappointing Kushite (with the emphasis on the second syllable) unprotected medium archers for yet more Cimmerian allied light horse.

The Babylonians won the initiative and chose to invade in Agricultural terrain. The battlefield was left fairly open, with some open fields in the Babylonian centre and on their right wing but most of the rest of the field more or less clear. The Median Ally option gave the Babylonians another 2 units of Superior cavalry (protected, but with Bow, not Bow* - picked specifically as an anti-chariot measure) plus some more archers with front-rank spear. This was paid for by dropping the second unit of Babylonian archers and 2 units of light foot. Having the initiative the Babylonians were able to put down chariots, heavy foot and Medians to face off the Assyrian chariots and guards, infantry occupied both centres with the Cimmerian light horse screening in front, and the Babylonian left saw the 2 superior guard cavalry units overawe some Assyrian light horse and inferior cavalry.

Battle was joined pretty much across the field. The Babylonian guard cavalry pushed forward to chase off the opposing light horse and cavalry then sweep back in to attack the various medium foot units that were trying to rally against them. In the centre Orhans combined light foot took out the one rubbishy Babylonian unprotected cavalry unit, allowing light horse to break through and begin to threaten the baggage. On the right, the Babylonian chariots and Median cavalry started to get the better of the opposing Assyrians, chasing off a unit of light foot and beginning to encircle the Assyrian left wing. As we stopped, the Assyrian elite guards were about to crash, supported by more chariots, into the Babylonian mercenary hoplites, who by now had been disrupted by the Assyrian bowfiew (so they probably would have been rolled up) - the question was, was this likely success in the centre going to be enough to stop the Babylonians winning decisively on the wings? The end scores were 2 broken units of Babylonians compared to 3 broken and 1 fragged of Assyrians.

Another good game. I think I liked the Medians, their cavalry has twice the shooting power of the Babylonians and the protected status is probably enough for this period. We kept a general with the unit of 6 superior chariots which worked well. The hoplites were fragile and really need to be screened until we can get them into combat. This configuration of Babs was good against Assyrians but how would it fare against other armies? Hope to find out soon.

The Battle of Edgehill - 27 February 2010

A return to Jonathan's to play the English Civil War battle of Edgehill.  Kieron and James were the Parliamentarians, with Jonathan, David and Steve, a colleague of Kieron's, playing the Royalists.  We arrived to find a 4' deep table running the length of Jonathan's games room, perhaps 14' long, with over 600 figures deployed in battle lines ready to fight.

The Royalists (on the right of photo) were down on numbers but with superior cavalry.  The Parliamentarians wanted to protect their flanks with cavalry but attempt to win through their number of foot.  But they were wary of the Royalist artillery on the central hill.

Too wary as it turned out given David's rolls but the plan was set. The Parliamentarians held back their foot in the centre and pushed forwards on the sides, and with their cavalry flanks.  The right flank was quickly engaged by the superior Royalist cavalry.

Here the Parliamentarians learned another lesson.  The reserve cavalry was far too close to the attacking regiments and the cavalry got hideously disrupted as they were pushed back by the Royalists.  Parliament's Horse were soon routed from the table pursued by Royalists.  The cavalry on the left flank held up a little longer but again were up against superior troops.

In the centre, the smile-shaped formation was not reflected on Kieron and James' faces.

Holding back the centre out of artillery range crammed in the Parliamentarian reserves and the advantage of numbers was not taken.  Exchange of musket fire and later close combat did take losses from both sides' foot, so we did get more up close and personal than the Battle of Newbury we played in January.

The rules (Bloody Kingdom, by the writer of Father Tilly - the ruleset used for the last ECW battle) reflect well the impact of losses on the army's morale and effectiveness, so certain dice rolls get harder to achieve as you lose more and more troops.  Consequently the early loss of the cavalry wing was a decisive factor.  By the time the Parliamentarians got their foot into combat, they were already fighting under par, and never really made much of a dent on the Royalist army, who were bolstered in turn 5 by the arrival of King Charles and reinforcements.

By the end of the eighth turn, Parliament's losses exceeded 25% and their troops were fighting at such a disadvantage, it was clear the battle was a decisive victory for the Royalists.  The table at that time shows how the Parliamentarian flanks have pretty much disappeared and the central foot is under pressure.

A fun game with superbly painted figures and great flags...

...and some lovely characters, like the Earl of Essex....

...and, my favourite, a sharpshooter balancing his aim through the hilt of his sword.

And finally, the obligatory fly-by video...

Cleopatra and the Society of Architects, Ticket To Ride Europe - 24 February 2010

Orhan writes: After some discussion on games we decided that we'd play Cleopatra and see if we had time for another game. Despite dog Sam's contributions to games night and me spending much of my time crawling around on the floor, we did manage to finish Cleopatra and play a game of Ticket to Ride Europe as well!

 

Cleopatra consists largely of trying to earn as much cash as possible without being naughty; a noble aspiration as the player with the most amount of coruption at the end of the game gets fed to the crocodiles. This was my first shot at Cleopatra and I have to admit that I liked it, there are enough variable elements to keep it entertaining all the way through and like all great games it has the potential for cliff hanger endings. Stu was much maligned at the start of the game as the player far more likely to end up inside a crocodile than anyone else and despite an early leap into the sordid pool of corruption he managed to discount a lot of his corruption by some clever play with the mosaics and winning the one round of sacrificing to the gods that we went through. The end result was that it was Kieron who ended up being tossed to hungry reptiles (and there was much rejoicing) rather than Stu. Stu amassed an unassailable lead on 59 points whilst Orhan (47), James (43), Kieron (42) and Adrian (40) were all very close on points...sadly Kieron didn't get to enjoy his 4th place on points as he was busy being digested by a slumbering croc.

Ticket to Ride Europe is a little different from other Ticket to Ride games on two major points. First you get to use stations which allow you to use a single route owned by another player and Second, there are tunnels which have a random element to determine if you succed in tunnelling through the route. There were some general murmurings that the European map was a little more interesting than the US maps and certainly the game was very hard contested. A couple of different strategies were employed with most people going for a few route cards at the start although I started off with a lot of route cards taking several extra hands of cards in the first few rounds. The game proved quite exciting with James managing to make a fantastic single route and claiming the prize to the longest European route whilst Stu, having observed that his game was unlikely to be a winning one, decided in true Rivals spirit to attempt to nobble James; saddly with very little success. The ending proved to be one of the closest we've ever seen at games night with a truely nail biting count off. The final scores in reverse order were: Stu (85), Adrian (100), Kieron (131), James (132), Orhan (133).

Field of Glory: Assyrians v Babylonians, 17 February 2010

With alternative half-term activities claiming the attentions of the majority of the Rivals, Orhan, David and Adrian met for FoG practice, testing out the new (Neo...) army choices of Neo-Assyrians for Orhan and Neo-Babylonians for Adrian and David. This was not so much civil war as generational strife - the Assyrians taking on their descendants.

In terms of lists, Orhan had gone for a light horse heavy variant, taking the Cimmerian allies. Adrian and Deej went for lots of light foot archers, with each army having at its core heavy chariots, guard cavalry and medium foot. We fought on agricultural terrain, the Babylonian centre based around a plantation and with lots of open fields on the right flank. Both sides had one flank largely dominated by medium foot archers and psiloi and the other with massed cavalry - the photo above shows the Babylonian right with mounted units facing off against Orhan's chariots and elite guards. As the armies came together Orhan launched three units of light horse to try to outflank Adrian's heavies. The manoeuvre failed as medium foot bowmen were brought up who, after shooting off 1 unit, charged another. The fact that there wasn't sufficient a gap for the Cimmerians to flee (which would have meant them bursting through Orhan's guard cavalry just as they were closing to contact) meant that they stood and fought - and miraculously held off the bowmen plus Adrian's Skythian light horse for several turns.

This delay allowed Orhan's guard and chariots to close with Adrian's and, with one more general to joint the fight and some nifty rolling, saw Adrian's heavy units crumble away. Meanwhile however, David's foot units were doing heavy damage to Orhan's on the other side of the board. The Babylonian guard spearmen and archers with front rank spears mashed up Orhan's unprotected Kushite bowmen, who very sportingly had decided to get stuck into the fight. As the Babylonian centre was staved in, the flanks were triumphant - the Cimmerian light horse being chased off and killed on the right and the Kushite rout taking 2 or 3 other units with it. The final score was a Babylonian victory - 4 routed and 2 fragged to 2 routed (I think).

Learning points: we liked the heavy chariot unit as a 'six' but next time it needs a general to accompany it all the way through. Five units of light foot was too many. Unprotected bow are really a bunch of pants. All in all a very entertaining game - and great to get the new figures on the table.

Gnadenlos! - 10 February 2010

And an hour left for a quick game of "Merciless" - the four player cowboy game with the ingenious and nail-biting IOU / Pay Day mechanism.  Lots of fun as always.  A close game with a final pay day leaving us all very short of money but unusually nobody was bankrupted at any point.  Final score was exactly the same order as the first game: James, David, Stuart and Kieron.  I'm posting a separate blog entry thanks to David pointing out that this means I can get credit in the tag tally for both my wins :-)

I'm sure I won't be the last to do it....

Race for the Galaxy - 10 February 2010

First outing for David's Race for the Galaxy which has just slipped out of the BGG Top Ten where its been for a couple of years.  This is a card game where players settle and conquer planets, build developments and produce/consume goods to earn victory points.  Echoes of Agricola in that each player is trying to make the most out of the game mechanism and interaction is quite limited.  The sole interaction is in the choice of which phases occur each turn - seven to choose from and everyone does each phase but only the chooser gets the bonus.  So you have to gamble on whether to select, for example, your second choice in the expectation that someone else will choose your first choice and you'll still get to complete that phase.

Some clever mechanisms but initially rather confusing, and so it took a while to click.  One to play again before we forget what all the symbols mean.  There are three expansion packs which might be worth investigating to see what they add to the game.  Final scores James 43, David 39, Stuart 38 and Kieron 32.

Imperial, 3 February 2010

The second outing for Imperial, this time with 5 players - which meant that for pretty much all of the game one player controlled two of the Great Powers. The players' strategies varied: Stu lost no opportunity to bankrupt whichever countries he could, casting Germany into a deep depression from which it didn't recover; James played Britain and France at various times but didn't branch out further East; Adrian built up Austria-Hungary into the pre-eminent power but didn't get much of a stake in anywhere else; Kieron and Deej were more balanced taking stakes in a couple of nations each which put them on top at the end.

The game saw a good mix of conflict and financial dealings with war in Germany and the Low Countries, Scandinavia and in various sea zones.

We think that we probably made a couple of mistakes in terms of providing extra cash to players who had no nations in the bidding stage - plus we weren't sure whether the bidding could bounce back and forth for players who then found themselves with no nation. This meant that it was a positive advantage for someone to have their nation taken off them since they accrued more money. Will have to look that up.

At any rate a good game. The final scores: Deej 142; Kieron 125; Adrian 111; James 75; Stu 70.